Search for: "Thompson v. People" Results 61 - 80 of 760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2011, 11:45 am by admin
Proctor Hospital*) and the other finding that retaliatory actions against third party employees can be found to be actionable under Title VII (Thompson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 12:38 pm
People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780,783 (1992); People v Thompson, 91 AD2d 672 (2nd Dept. 1982), modified 60 NY2d 513 (1983); People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 (2nd Dept. 1982). [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
I don't know all that much about Anders/Wende briefs. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
DealBook: How a Raid in Benghazi Helped Shape Citigroup’s $7 Billion Settlement Michael Thompson fights to vote on Chief Bill Blair's future | LEVY | Toronto Revisiting Aboriginal Title Part III: SCC Clarification in Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia Top 7 most prominent dissents during the Roberts Supreme Court era U.S. appeals court sides with same-sex marriage proponents in Utah  Female Yahoo executive sued for sexual harassment Avoid… [read post]
1 May 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Jean Stefancic , University of Alabama School of Law, has posted Terrace v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by SHG
The Supreme Court should, obviously, grant cert in Truvia and Bright, as the 5th Circuits affirmance of the dismissal of their cause makes Thompson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:35 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Yesterday, the NY Court of Appeals decided People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Thompson's book for The New RamblerWeekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History blogger. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]