Search for: "Thompson v. Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Gathers, 490 U.S. 805, 824 (1989) (Scalia, J., dissenting). [13] Stout, supra note 2, at 168. [14] Thompson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by Melissa L. Greipp
Meredith Donaldson and Ben Lucareli AJ Lawton and Ashley Smith v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 3:48 pm
Judge Milan Smith -- a Bush II appointee, and hardly a raving liberal -- writes an opinion joined by Judge Thompson (a Reagan appointee) and Judge Canby that holds that the statements made by Rodriguez post-equivocal invocation must be suppressed because the police didn't clarify what he meant by "I'm good. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
 In such situations, the prosecutor may be relying on evidence that exists in the case, but characterizes it differently depending on what suits the prosecutor’s theory, even if the arguments made in both cases are  mutually inconsistent (see, e.g., Smith v Groose, 205 F3d 1045, 1050 [8th Cir 2000]; Thompson v Calderon, 120 F3d 1045 [9th Cir 1997], rev’d on other grounds 523 US 538; United States v Salerno, 937 F2d 797, 812 [2nd Cir… [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
For the reasons that follow, the panel concludes that although the bankruptcy court abused its discretion by applying an erroneous legal standard, the court's decision should be affirmed. 07a0445p.06 Thompson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm by Eugene Kontorovich
But these were self-conscious executive interpretations of a statute, authored by a cabinet secretary (and subsequently a Justice on the Supreme Court), Smith Thompson. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:08 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
On June 26, 1991, operating under this policy, Thompson applied a herbicide by aerial application to the Smith Trust Ranch. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 10:17 pm
The suit by two prisoners challenged denial of a Halal diet, denial of a Muslim sponsor, claims regarding prayer at work, interference with the ability to observe Ramadan, and a prohibition on wearing dreadlocks.In Smith v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:21 pm by Brian Shiffrin
" We also agree with the further contention of defendant that the fact that he received the bargained-for sentence does not preclude him from seeking our discretionary review of his sentence pursuant to CPL 470.15 (6) (b) (see People v Smith, 32 AD3d 553, 554; see generally People v Pollenz, 67 NY2d 264; People v Thompson, 60 NY2d 513, 519-520). [read post]