Search for: "Thompson v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2007, 9:52 am
For publication opinions today (3): In Robert Thompson, et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 5:28 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
Pa.2009 Hart, M.J.)But see: Thompson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:52 pm
The Marion Superior Court entered summary judgment for St. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm
However, in this recent Slate article, Richard Thompson Ford, a leading defender of affirmative action, puts his finger on one aspect of the case that gives me some pause: Here is where the one potentially important difference between Grutter [v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:35 am
Thompson saw the court split 5-4 along its conservative-liberal divide. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:07 pm
Some of that underbelly was challenged but escaped unscathed in Thompson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:29 am
Thompson, supra (quoting In re F.P., 878 A.2d 91 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania 2005). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
"Simmons v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
The insurer then filed a motion in the Superior Court asking for a reduction in the damage award. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the 1898 case of Thompson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 8:13 am
State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:29 am
The first was Wednesday’s oral argument in the Supreme Court in Connick v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
The insurer then filed a motion in the Superior Court asking for a reduction in the damage award. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:29 am
Because a group health plan covered room and board expenses for stays at skilled nursing facilities, the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) required it to do so for residential mental health treatment facilities as well, a federal appeals court ruled in Danny P. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:29 am
Because a group health plan covered room and board expenses for stays at skilled nursing facilities, the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) required it to do so for residential mental health treatment facilities as well, a federal appeals court ruled in Danny P. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Ross, for Jo Ann Rivera, John Schaefer, Jessica Schaefer, Hilary Kulik, Gretchen Thompson, Ronald Schaefer, Jr. and Matthew Schaefer, Amicus Curiae. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:14 am
Furthermore, the relevant inquiry under Thompson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:10 pm
In 2016, the Ontario Superior Court went a step further in R. v Rogers Communications siding with Rogers and Telus, which had refused to grant the Peel Regional Police a “tower dump” of cell phone data to investigate a robbery. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
The Superior Court of California’s recently reported decision forcing Twitter to hand over the details of its users to South Tyneside Council is also potentially important. [read post]
