Search for: "Thornburg v. Gingles"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
Here is the abstract; Justice William Brennan’s opinion in Thornburg v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 9:04 pm
In the breakthrough case of Thornburg v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 2:46 pm
In the breakthrough case of Thornburg v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 11:41 pm
Here is the abstract: For two decades, the doctrinal test laid out in Thornburg v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:48 am
De Grandy, 512 U.S. 997, 1006–1007, 114 S.Ct. 2647, 129 L.Ed.2d 775 (1994) (cleaned up) (indirectly quoting Thornburg v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:52 pm
" Thornburg v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 7:06 am
The Supreme Court has devised a complicated framework for analyzing these cases, found in Thornburg v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 1:59 pm
The phrase “vote dilution” does not appear in Section 2, but it has been part of the vocabulary of equal voting rights since the Supreme Court decided Thornburg v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm
Strickland and Thornburg v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 10:54 am
Additionally, there is a long and robust line of cases, starting with the 1986 case of Thornburg v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:28 am
Under Thornburg v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:08 am
In 1986, in Thornburg v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:01 am
Duke Power and Albemarle Paper Co. v Moody, which expanded the law of employment discrimination to prohibit disparate racial impacts of racially neutral policies; and Thornburg v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:01 am
Duke Power and Albemarle Paper Co. v Moody, which expanded the law of employment discrimination to prohibit disparate racial impacts of racially neutral policies; and Thornburg v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm
Gingles. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:04 am
Thornburg are met. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm
Gingles. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Bolden v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
On a 5-4 vote, Shaw v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
"); United States v. [read post]
