Search for: "Thornton v. Paul" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Robinson, Center for Health Decision Science; Craig Thornton, Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis; and W. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
On 27 February 2023, judgment was handed down in FGX v Gaunt [2023] EWHC 419 (KB) by Thornton J, thought to be the first civil case on intimate-image abuse (commonly referred to as “revenge porn”) of its kind. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am by Unknown
Sherman, the subcommittee’s Ranking Member, and Juan Vargas (D-Calif), Alexandra Thornton, Senior Director at the Center for American Progress, spoke about two things she views as problematic about private markets. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
In London Historic Parks And Gardens Trust v Minister of State for Housing & Anor [2022] EWHC 829 (Admin), Thornton J held that the grant of planning permission had been ultra vires the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900 and refused permission to appeal. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 9:44 am by Katherine Pompilio
Benjamin Wittes analyzed Judge David Carter’s March 28 opinion on Donald Trump and John Eastman in Eastman v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm by James Romoser
Thornton, in which the court agreed with him that states cannot impose term limits on members of Congress. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
”Latest Court of Session opinion on Heather Capital, published 28 February 2017: EXTRA DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2017] CSIH 19 CA207/14 and CA208/14 Lady Paton Lady Clark of Calton Lord Glennie OPINION OF LADY PATON in the cause HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer and Reclaimer against LEVY & McRAE and others Defenders and Respondents and HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as… [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am by INFORRM
As is well known, at the common law, following Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2011] 1 WLR 1985, “defamatory” incorporates a qualification or threshold of seriousness: “the publication of which [a claimant] complains may be defamatory of him because it [substantially] affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards him, or has a tendency to do so. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Earlier this year, our old friend and colleague Paul Schwind gave us an update on the details of the federal litigation challenging the $5+ billion Honolulu rail project, Honolulutraffic.com v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
We also discuss two Southern District of New York decisions applying the Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]