Search for: "Thornton v. Paul"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm
Earlier this year, our old friend and colleague Paul Schwind gave us an update on the details of the federal litigation challenging the $5+ billion Honolulu rail project, Honolulutraffic.com v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
The most discussed case of the week was the decision of Mr Justice Tugendhat in Thornton v Telegraph Group ([2010] EWHC 1414 (QB)) which was the subject of a post on this blog. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
Thornton (1995) -- rejected state imposition of term limits on members of Congress, holding that the Constitution prohibits states from adopting congressional qualifications in addition to those enumerated in the Constitution.Clinton v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:42 am
The defendant could not recover his costs of pleadings in those matters or any costs occasioned by those matters Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2011] EWHC 159 (QB) – 2 Feb 2011. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:37 am
Karl V. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
In the Courts On 28 October 2011 Sir Richard Buxton refused the defendant permission to appeal in the case of Thornton v Telegraph Media Group (see Case Tracker). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm
This is the judgment after the jury less libel trial of Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, (heard 4 to 6 and 8 July 2011). [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am
In London Historic Parks And Gardens Trust v Minister of State for Housing & Anor [2022] EWHC 829 (Admin), Thornton J held that the grant of planning permission had been ultra vires the London County Council (Improvements) Act 1900 and refused permission to appeal. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm
The Sydney libel trial of Antoine Bechara v Paul Bonaccorso continuing last week. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am
The case of Thornton v Telegraph Group has been listed before Sedley LJ for argument on 14 October 2010 to deal with various issues, including costs. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
”Latest Court of Session opinion on Heather Capital, published 28 February 2017: EXTRA DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2017] CSIH 19 CA207/14 and CA208/14 Lady Paton Lady Clark of Calton Lord Glennie OPINION OF LADY PATON in the cause HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer and Reclaimer against LEVY & McRAE and others Defenders and Respondents and HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as… [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:50 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments in media cases remain outstanding: Imerman v Tchenguiz (and linked appeals), heard 10 to 11 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) British Broadcasting Corporation v Sugar, heard 17 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) Khader v Aziz and Davenport Lyons, heard 19 May 2010 (Sir Anthony May P, Carnwath and Moore-Bick LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers Limited, heard 25 and… [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
On the same day the Court of Appeal (Laws LJ) dismissed a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Thornton v Telegraph Media Group. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
ROBERT SCOTT, HONORABLECOMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, THORNTON KEEL, DONNA KEEL, MICHAEL HELLRUNG, DONNA HELLRUNG, WILLIAM PASCHALL, DAVID WOMACK, NATALIE KLOSS, DARRYL HUBBELL AND AMY HUBBELL; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-07-00576-CV, 275 SW3d 558, 11-14-08, pet. denied Sep. 2009)09-0138CITY OF AUSTIN, ET AL. v. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
The New Statesman published details of a secretly recorded conversation with former News of the World journalist Paul McMullan boasting of his phone hacking activities in the past. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
Sherman, the subcommittee’s Ranking Member, and Juan Vargas (D-Calif), Alexandra Thornton, Senior Director at the Center for American Progress, spoke about two things she views as problematic about private markets. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:34 am
“ Lozano v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
Hicks in 1987 through Florida v. [read post]
