Search for: "Thornton v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 250
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
James Room)Panel 3: The Disciplinary State, 2:00-3:30Chair: Erin Braatz, Suffolk University Law School (ebraatz@suffolk.edu)Commentator: Lauren Benton, Vanderbilt University (lauren.benton@vanderbilt.edu)Stacey Hynd, University of Exeter (s.hynd@exeter.ac.uk) (Re-)Constructing Murder: Capital Punishment and the Criminalization of African Bodies in Colonial Ghana, c. 1890-1957Dior Konate, South Carolina State University (dkonate@scsu.edu) Imprisonment and Citizenship in… [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 6:46 am by Daily Record Staff
Administrative law — State Personnel and Pensions Article — Statute of limitations Sheron Thornton, appellant, worked for the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, appellee, as a senior agent in its Division of Parole and Probation. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:10 am by Emma-Louise Fenelon
     The Prevent Guidance in Universities with Marina Wheeler QC (Episode 75) Emma-Louise Fenelon talks to Marina Wheeler QC about the recent Court of Appeal decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department and the operation of the Prevent Guidance generally. 7. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thornton, in which a majority invalidated a state's effort to place term limits on its congressional delegation. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:58 am by Guest Contributor
Prior to the Defamation Act 2013 the courts had introduced a minimum threshold of seriousness to defamation claims: first a procedural threshold in Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946 and then a substantive threshold in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] 1 WLR 1985. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The Court found that section 1 of the 2013 Act not only raises the threshold of seriousness from that in Jameel and Thornton, but requires its application to be determined by reference to the actual facts about its impact, not merely the meaning of the words [12]. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
In the light of this, it considered that Parliament’s choice to use the wording of “serious harm” could only have represented an intentional departure from the previous decisions in Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 74 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:21 pm by Alethea Redfern
 In the Courts  Hameed & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: The Secretary of State successfully appealed in a case relating to the Asylum and Immigration (Fast Track Procedure) Rules 2005 and the circumstances in which the respondent Pakistani husband and wife were detained at Yarl’s Wood IRC pending disposal of their appeals under the Detained Fast Track process. [read post]