Search for: "Thornton v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2007, 11:06 am
While the United States Supreme Court is cranking out a plethora of 5-4 decisions, with a very well-defined liberal and conservative group (and Justice Kennedy as the swing), the California Supreme Court's decisions are often the exact opposite. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:11 am
Jan. 20, 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Utah dismissing a securities fraud class action brought by investors in iMergent against its independent auditor, Grant Thornton.  [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:11 pm
  In any event, here is the opinion's first paragraph:David Thornton appeals from the district court's decision to not re-sentence him after a limited remand pursuant to United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 7:21 am by Shannon Walker
Hodges [opinion, PDF], in which the Court declared state bans on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:23 pm by Patricia Salkin
Here, although the Board identified two primary reasons for its denial of the initial application: that the campground was not open to the general public and the initial application presented park model units with a greater amount of permanency than what is intended in the Thornton Campground Regulations and State statutes, it was clear that the Board’s principal concern was the permanency and relative immobility of the proposed park model units. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 7:35 am by Steven Cohen
United States v Hill – United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit – March 21st, 2016 – In this case involving a bank robbery and money laundering, the Appellant appeals an order from the district court. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm by Josh Blackman
A ruling that electors are "subordinate" state officers would undermine the core reasoning of Thornton, and, perhaps, Powell v. [read post]