Search for: "Thornton v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 216
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am by Scott Bomboy
Thornton, a divided Supreme Court ruled that states could not add qualifications for office for members of Congress in addition to those explicitly stated in the Constitution. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
The Colorado state trial court held that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
  Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:56 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thornton that states may not add qualifications to the ones provided in the Constitution. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am by Marty Lederman
Below are links to the complete series of my posts on Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Thornton, which barred the states from adding additional qualifications to federal offices. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am by Marty Lederman
  For the President and the Vice President of the United States are the only elected officials who represent all the voters in the Nation. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]