Search for: "Tidwell v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2010, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Plaintiffs-Appellants Native Ecosystems Council, et al (collectively NEC) appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Tom Tidwell, the United States Forest Service, et al (collectively Forest Service); Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees Madison County and Beaverhead County; and Intervenors-Appellees Sitz Angus Ranch, et al (collectively Intervenors-Appellees). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:25 pm by WIMS
The United States Forest Service (the Service) proposed the Smith Creek Project (the Project) in the Gallatin National Forest to reduce the risk of severe wildfire, to reduce the risk of insect infestation and disease, and to promote habitat diversity. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 10:36 am by WIMS
(Copar), proceeding under the Administrative Procedure Act, (APA), appeals the district court's denial of its petition for review concerning the Notice of Noncompliance that the United States Forest Service (FS) issued to Copar concerning its pumice mining activities. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 11:33 am by Bryan Hawkins
The Ohio Supreme Court recently weighed in on these questions in State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 10:39 am
They also maintained that Stanford's behavior was actionable under Sabine Pilot Services Inc. v. [read post]