Search for: "Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2017, 7:13 am
PR argued that, under Prestonettes, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 7:36 am
” See Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 96–97 (2d Cir.2010) (eBay does not “does not itself sell the items listed for sale on the site nor does it ever take physical possession of them. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 3:49 pm
Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F. 3d 93 (2d. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 am
Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:38 am
” Tiffany (NJ) Inc. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:30 am
” Tiffany (NJ) Inc. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
Relying on Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 109 (2d Cir. 2010), the Court explained that when a service provider "has reason to suspect that users of its service are infringing a protected mark, it may not shield itself from learning of the particular infringing transactions by looking the other way." [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:26 am
Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v eBay, Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 110 n.16 (2d Cir. 2010) (collecting cases); see In re Aimster Copyright Litig., 334 F.3d 643, 650 (7th Cir. 2003) (‘Willful blindness is knowledge, in copyright law . . . as it is in the law generally.’). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:03 am
CCBill LLC, 488 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2007) ……………………………………………………………passim Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 576 F. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:31 am
Specifically, online service providers should consider undertaking the kind of measures described in Tiffany (NJ), Inc. v. eBay (2d. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:57 am
See Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 112–113 (2d Cir. 2010) (setting out elements for Lanham Act false advertising claim, which do not include a requirement that a party possess trademark rights); see also J. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
Trademark * Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc, 2010 WL 3416635 (U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
As Bloomberg, Law & Disorder, and the Wall Street Journal all report, the Court denied cert. in Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v eBay, a trademark infringement suit. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:15 pm
In a decision rendered this past Friday in Manhattan (Tiffany (NJ) Inc. et al v. eBay Inc., U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:19 pm
In addition, eBay took substantial steps to prevent and detect the sale of counterfeit goods on its website.The opinion in Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc., filed September 13, 2010, will be reported at CCH Advertising Law Guide ¶63,967. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:05 am
Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:03 pm
See Tiffany (NJ) Inc. and Tiffany and Company v. eBay, Inc., Case, No. 04-cv-04607 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 1:19 pm
Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., No. 08-3947, slip op. at 43 (2d Cir. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:32 am
The law required that eBay be held accountable for the words that it chose insofar as they misled or confused consumers, the court concluded.The April 1 opinion in Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc. will be reported in CCH Advertising Law Guide. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
By Eric Goldman Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 2010 WL 1236315 (2d Cir. [read post]
