Search for: "Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2021, 2:50 pm
We nevertheless reach the merits of Canal’s trademark arguments via its appeal of the jury instructions, and we reject Canal’s position as inconsistent with our precedent in Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:13 am
PR argued that, under Prestonettes, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 7:36 am
” See Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 96–97 (2d Cir.2010) (eBay does not “does not itself sell the items listed for sale on the site nor does it ever take physical possession of them. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 3:49 pm
Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F. 3d 93 (2d. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 am
Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:38 am
” Tiffany (NJ) Inc. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:30 am
” Tiffany (NJ) Inc. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
Relying on Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 109 (2d Cir. 2010), the Court explained that when a service provider "has reason to suspect that users of its service are infringing a protected mark, it may not shield itself from learning of the particular infringing transactions by looking the other way. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:26 am
’ Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v eBay, Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 110 n.16 (2d Cir. 2010) (collecting cases); see In re Aimster Copyright Litig., 334 F.3d 643, 650 (7th Cir. 2003) (‘Willful blindness is knowledge, in copyright law . . . as it is in the law generally. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm
” The lower court relied too heavily on the Second Circuit’s decision in Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., which rejected a contributory infringement claim against the Internet auction site based on use of the TIFFANY’S trademark by jewelry counterfeiters on the site. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:03 am
CCBill LLC, 488 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2007) ……………………………………………………………passim Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 576 F. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:31 am
Specifically, online service providers should consider undertaking the kind of measures described in Tiffany (NJ), Inc. v. eBay (2d. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:57 am
See Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93, 112–113 (2d Cir. 2010) (setting out elements for Lanham Act false advertising claim, which do not include a requirement that a party possess trademark rights); see also J. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 11:20 am
In Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
Trademark * Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc, 2010 WL 3416635 (U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:00 am
The Rosetta Stone case also involves nominative fair use issues, similar to the 2nd Circuit case Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93, (2d Cir. 2010), where the 2nd Circuit held that a defendant “may lawfully use a plaintiff's trademark where doing so is necessary to describe the plaintiff’s product and does not imply a false affiliation or endorsement by the plaintiff of the defendant. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
As Bloomberg, Law & Disorder, and the Wall Street Journal all report, the Court denied cert. in Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v eBay, a trademark infringement suit. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
On August 27, 2010, Tiffany (NJ) Inc., and Tiffany & Co. filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari appealing the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:56 pm
Does 1 (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions Google gets good results in three adwords trademark cases: Jurin, Flowbee, Dazzlesmile (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court dismisses Tiffany’s final claim against eBay: Tiffany (NJ) Inc. and Tiffany and Company v. eBay, Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:15 pm
In a decision rendered this past Friday in Manhattan (Tiffany (NJ) Inc. et al v. eBay Inc., U.S. [read post]
