Search for: "Time, Inc. v. Hill" Results 61 - 80 of 1,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2014, 12:27 am by John Diekman
  In fact, depending on the circumstances, a plaintiff is not always required to establish both a justifiable excuse and a potentially meritorious cause of action to avoid such a dismissal.Case:  Belson v Dix Hills A.C., Inc., NY Slip Op 05144 (2d Dept. 2014)Here is the decision.Tomorrow's issue: Service, and the due diligence requirement of 308(4). [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am by Schachtman
The former consideration today is often addressed by meta-analyses, tests of homogeneity, and p-curves, none of which was in common use in 1965, at the time of Hill’s Presidential address. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
ANZ Securities Inc.: pendency of class action does not suspend three-year time limit for filing individual securities actions [Kevin LaCroix/D & O Diary, Federalist Society podcast with Mark Chenoweth] Why I’m not joining the fury over Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Pavan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Following the guidance from the decision in Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:27 am
Bloomfield Hills School District, Case No. 137607; granted an extension of time for the plaintiffs to file their appellees brief in Hendee v. [read post]