Search for: "Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2016, 7:42 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Omega Flex, Inc.,104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), a defendant in a strict-liability claim based on a failure-to-warn theory has the right to have a jury determine whether its product was “unreasonably dangerous[?] [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), somehow altered Pennsylvania’s negligence-only standard for prescription medical product litigation that has been unquestioned since Hahn v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:18 pm
Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), which erased the distinction between negligence and strict liability and products liability cases. [read post]
24 May 2021, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), which erased the distinction between negligence and strict liability and products liability cases. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 11:20 am by Sean Wajert
Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), plaintiffs have attempted to muddy the prescription product waters given the Supreme Court’s decision to leave the precise contours of its rulings to the lower courts. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), we stated up front that we didn’t think that Tincher changed Pennsulvania law applicable to prescription medical products much, if at all. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:49 am
Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014).The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that such compliance evidence is inadmissible in this context. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Omega Flex, Inc., but falls short of coherence or clarity [Deborah La Fetra, Pacific Legal Foundation; Max Kennerly with a plaintiff's-side view]. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2017 Pa. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Omega Flex, Inc., in which the court did not adopt the Restatement (Third) of Torts analysis for products liability cases but did alter the required analysis, and in the case of Zauflik v. [read post]