Search for: "Tinsley v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2019, 7:30 am by Daily Record Staff
The State informed the court that Tinsley’s plea agreement ... [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:58 am by familoo
I particularly like this one : 06-376C • PHILIP TINSLEY III, v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Alex Tinsley is the Strategic Caseworker at Fair Trials International, a human rights charity which provides assistance to those facing criminal charges in a country other than their own. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:19 am by Kathy Darvil
On May 22nd, the United States Supreme Court, in Cooper v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am by Conor McEvily
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 8:27 pm by Alfred Brophy
 Aubrey Strode, the state's lawyer in Buck v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:14 pm by Leslie Pardo
One of the other Supreme Court clerks with whom she served, Deborah Jones Merritt, reflected in the Arizona State Law Journal that Justice McGregor worked on the influential case Mississippi University for Women v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:44 pm
" "States can't give death penaly for child rape," by Anna Tinsley in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.Jessica's Law boosts penalties for those who commit a sexually violent crime against a child younger than 14. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am by Alasdhair McDonald, Olswang LLP
Lord Sumption also rejected the approaches taken at first instance and by the Court of Appeal in holding that the defence of illegality was a rule of law and that previous attempts to introduce a discretionary element into the doctrine had been expressly rejected by the House of Lords in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Best, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Justice (Rev 1) [2015] EWCA Civ 17 The Court of Appeal considered the clash of s.144 LASPO and the rules on adverse possession, on appeal from the Administrative Court. [read post]
6 May 2006, 8:54 pm
He said at paragraphs 84 and 85:[82] In both Scheuerman and Tinsley v. [read post]