Search for: "Tinsley v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2019, 7:30 am
The State informed the court that Tinsley’s plea agreement ... [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 5:01 am
From last week’s Louisiana Court of Appeal decision in Tinsley v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:58 am
I particularly like this one : 06-376C • PHILIP TINSLEY III, v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 10:23 am
In this case, Tinsley v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:24 am
RFT Management Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 5:10 am
Here's the abstract: The Second Circuit's December 2012 decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:47 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm
Alex Tinsley is the Strategic Caseworker at Fair Trials International, a human rights charity which provides assistance to those facing criminal charges in a country other than their own. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:31 am
Tinsley v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:19 am
On May 22nd, the United States Supreme Court, in Cooper v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 8:27 pm
Aubrey Strode, the state's lawyer in Buck v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:14 pm
One of the other Supreme Court clerks with whom she served, Deborah Jones Merritt, reflected in the Arizona State Law Journal that Justice McGregor worked on the influential case Mississippi University for Women v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:44 pm
" "States can't give death penaly for child rape," by Anna Tinsley in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.Jessica's Law boosts penalties for those who commit a sexually violent crime against a child younger than 14. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am
Lord Sumption also rejected the approaches taken at first instance and by the Court of Appeal in holding that the defence of illegality was a rule of law and that previous attempts to introduce a discretionary element into the doctrine had been expressly rejected by the House of Lords in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Best, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Justice (Rev 1) [2015] EWCA Civ 17 The Court of Appeal considered the clash of s.144 LASPO and the rules on adverse possession, on appeal from the Administrative Court. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:35 am
State v. [read post]
6 May 2006, 8:54 pm
He said at paragraphs 84 and 85:[82] In both Scheuerman and Tinsley v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm
" Tinsley v. [read post]
