Search for: "Tolle v. Superior Court" Results 221 - 240 of 312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
”[21] The Panel explains that this formulation is desirable because it will provide the courts and litigants with notice of appropriate uses of the legislation, and by doing so, it will deter litigation that does not fall within the appropriate uses.[22] As well, a purpose clause will help litigants differentiate between SLAPPs and non-SLAPPs, the latter of which is subject to the limited remedies for traditional civil actions.[23] An effective purpose clause plays the crucial roles… [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:14 pm
In general, puffery includes statements of exaggerated boasting or vague, subjective claims of superiority. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:50 pm by Justin P. Walsh
In Mellish v. frog Mountain Pet Care, the court held that the filing of a motion for reconsideration tolls the time for filing a land use petition in the superior court. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm by Bexis
  Indeed, Dukes might not have been as damaging to multi-jurisdictional class actions as the Court’s other recent opinion in Smith v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am by Marie Louise
4th Chamber of Superior Court of Justice decides on royalties collection for public performance of music in rodeo (IP tango)   Canada What is ‘use’ of a mark? [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm by Aaron Pelley
The Court held that the superior court does not have discretion in sentencing when a firearm restriction is statutorily mandated and the legislature included no discretion to waive or limit the firearm restriction, and ordered the provision stricken from the judgment and sentence. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:54 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Superior Court of Pennsylvania)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionSupplemental brief for petitionerSecond supplemental brief for petitioner (forthcoming)Petitioner's replyCVSG Information:Invited: November 1, 2010Filed: May 6, 2011 (Grant) Title: General Electric Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the store chain in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:44 pm
A Fosamax jury trial began last week in the Superior Court for Atlantic County, New Jersey. [read post]