Search for: "Tom Goldstein" Results 181 - 200 of 1,135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2016, 5:09 pm
"Five potential nominees from the federal appellate bench": Tom Goldstein has this post today at "SCOTUSblog. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:38 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
The most influential publication covering the Supreme Court today is SCOTUSblog, co-founded by Attorneys Tom Goldstein and Amy Howe, husband and wife, in 2002. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 3:05 pm
"Continued thoughts on the next nominee (and impressions of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson)": Tom Goldstein has this post at "SCOTUSblog. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 12:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Matt McClain/The Washington Post) So writes Tom Goldstein at SCOTUSblog: There is historical precedent for this circumstance that points to the Court ordering the cases reargued once a new Justice is confirmed. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:50 am by Steven Koprince
 In a post this morning on SCOTUSblog, publisher Tom Goldstein predicts that any cases resulting in a 4-4 tie will be “reargued once a new Justice is confirmed. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by Wystan Ackerman
As Tom Goldstein explains at SCOTUSblog, the Court has traditionally not issued opinions based on the vote of a justice who has died or left the Court before the opinion is issued. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 6:09 am by David Markus
The White House may calculate that a decision by Republicans to block him could have political consequences in places with sizable Latino voting populations — including his home state of Florida, a swing state in presidential elections, which also has a Senate election this year.SCOTUSBlog's Tom Goldstein hasn't mentioned Jordan yet. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
"Ninth Circuit Judge Paul Watford is the most likely nominee to replace Antonin Scalia": Tom Goldstein has this post at "SCOTUSblog. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 7:23 am by Andrew Hamm
Here is a collection of our coverage: Tom Goldstein provides first reactions and explains what happens to this Term’s close cases. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:26 am by Steve Vladeck
As Tom Goldstein noted at SCOTUSblog, we could see a bunch of orders dismissing such cases by an equally divided Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 8:55 pm by Amy Howe
Tom Goldstein also contributed to this post. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:14 pm by Andrew Hamm
This blog’s Tom Goldstein provides first reactions and explains what happens to this Term’s close cases. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:12 pm by Josh Douglas
(Tom Goldstein of SCOTUSBlog provides some thoughts on this point here.) [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
Another unavoidable issue arises from the fact that Amy Howe -- a wonderful person who I admire tremendously -- is the wife of "SCOTUSblog" publisher Tom Goldstein, who heads the blog's sponsoring law firm. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:58 am by Amy Howe
At the same time, we are in a somewhat unusual position as a news outlet: our publisher, Tom Goldstein, and his law partners regularly appear before the Court, and his firm provides essential financial support for the blog. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
[More…] An Insider Trader Caught On Tape Tells All by Jacob Goldstein in NPR’s Planet Money A former accountant convicted of insider trading tells his story to our “Planet Money” podcast team: what he did, how he did it and why. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]