Search for: "Tom Goldstein"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,063
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2016, 6:08 pm
That's SCOTUSblog's Tom Goldstein in this post about who might get the nomination. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 3:05 pm
"Continued thoughts on the next nominee (and impressions of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson)": Tom Goldstein has this post at "SCOTUSblog. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:50 am
In a post this morning on SCOTUSblog, publisher Tom Goldstein predicts that any cases resulting in a 4-4 tie will be “reargued once a new Justice is confirmed. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
As Tom Goldstein explains at SCOTUSblog, the Court has traditionally not issued opinions based on the vote of a justice who has died or left the Court before the opinion is issued. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 6:09 am
The White House may calculate that a decision by Republicans to block him could have political consequences in places with sizable Latino voting populations — including his home state of Florida, a swing state in presidential elections, which also has a Senate election this year.SCOTUSBlog's Tom Goldstein hasn't mentioned Jordan yet. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
"Ninth Circuit Judge Paul Watford is the most likely nominee to replace Antonin Scalia": Tom Goldstein has this post at "SCOTUSblog. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 7:23 am
Here is a collection of our coverage: Tom Goldstein provides first reactions and explains what happens to this Term’s close cases. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:26 am
As Tom Goldstein noted at SCOTUSblog, we could see a bunch of orders dismissing such cases by an equally divided Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 8:55 pm
Tom Goldstein also contributed to this post. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:14 pm
This blog’s Tom Goldstein provides first reactions and explains what happens to this Term’s close cases. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:12 pm
(Tom Goldstein of SCOTUSBlog provides some thoughts on this point here.) [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
Another unavoidable issue arises from the fact that Amy Howe -- a wonderful person who I admire tremendously -- is the wife of "SCOTUSblog" publisher Tom Goldstein, who heads the blog's sponsoring law firm. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:58 am
At the same time, we are in a somewhat unusual position as a news outlet: our publisher, Tom Goldstein, and his law partners regularly appear before the Court, and his firm provides essential financial support for the blog. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
Goldstein, 6 NY3d 119 [Court of Appeals of New York [2005]. . .; accord Matter of State of New York v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
