Search for: "Tomlinson v. State Bar" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
Given the differing traditions from which its judges are drawn, and bearing in mind that the court has not regarded the award of just satisfaction as its principal concern, it is not altogether surprising that it has generally dealt with the subject relatively briefly, and has offered little explanation of its reasons for awarding particular amounts or for declining to make an award”, per Lord Reed, Regina (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] 2 AC 254 [34]. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Court considered the recent analysis of the English High Court’s power to grant injunctions in the case of Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Limited ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch))(see our discussion here). [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Like many district courts that followed Bell, the Court, in Tomlinson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
Fundamentally, it would not be fair for Pupil C to be barred from a claim in negligence against her school where Pupils A and B were not. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
Fundamentally, it would not be fair for Pupil C to be barred from a claim in negligence against her school where Pupils A and B were not. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am by UKSC Blog
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
  Chambers and Partners also announced its UK Bar awards 2015 [pdf] with Matrix Chambers winning the award for defamation set of the year, Hugh Tomlinson QC defamation silk of the year, and Catrin Evans defamation junior of the year. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 20 and Thursday 21 January the Supreme Court will hear the case of R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considers whether the rule against reflective loss bars creditors of a company from claiming directly against a third party for asset-stripping the company. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Tomlinson, Bill and Patt [read post]