Search for: "Tomlinson v. Tomlinson" Results 1 - 20 of 531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
– Brian Cathcart Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori Our intention continues to be to serve as a “forum” for debating issues and we would encourage readers to offer contributions on any issue concerning media responsibility, media law and the other topics which we have been writing about. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Bild GmbH v Germany [2023] ECHR 851 the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights found that an order that a publisher should cease publication of CCTV footage of an arrest without pixelating the face of one of the officers involved was a violation of Article 10 as it could lead to an unacceptable ban on future publication on matters of public interest. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
RWP23-020 Tomlinson, Bill and Patterson, Donald and Torrance, Andrew W., Turning Fake Data into Fake News: The A.I. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am by INFORRM
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
The success of Google’s appeal in Lloyd v Google and the decision in Warren v DSG Retail (see our post here) seems to have halted 2021’s flow of data breach claims. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 12:45 am by INFORRM
Tomlinson LJ held that, although data protection legislation imposed duties upon controllers, that was insufficient of itself to give rise to a statutory duty for the purposes of the tort of breach of statutory duty: “you cannot derive a common law duty of care directly from a statutory duty” ([73] citing Customs and Excise Commissioners v Barclays Bank [2007] 181, 200, [2006] UKHL 28 (21 June 2006) [39] (Lord Hoffmann)). [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  There was a report of the decision in the Press Gazette focussing on the case of the actor Ricky Tomlinson. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 5:33 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of the Matrix Chambers media and information practice group and editor of Inforrm. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The success of Google’s appeal in Lloyd v Google and the decision in Warren v DSG Retail (see our post here) seems to have halted 2021’s flow of data breach claims. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Events Anya Proops QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC and Jorge Oliveira, Head of Data Protection at FIFA, are running a remote panel session for LawInSport’s annual conference on Tuesday 7 November 2021. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]