Search for: "Tomlinson v. Tomlinson" Results 81 - 100 of 531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
In Rudd v Bridle [2019] EWHC 893 (QB), Warby J tried a number of issues arising out of a data subject access request (“DSAR”) under s.7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (“the DPA 1998”). [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 A reserved judgment is awaited in the fourth, Sobrinho v Impressa Publishing, heard on 7 to 9 December 2015 by Dingemans J. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
In the case of ML and WW v Germany ([2018] ECHR 554) (available only French), the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights dismissed an Article 8 “right to be forgotten” application in respect of the historic publication by the media of information concerning a murder conviction. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
  This was first posted on 23 February 2010 and is the first part of a three part post in which Hugh Tomlinson QC considers the future of the law of privacy. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The Prime Minister said last week that he was “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
This is the second time that the Strasbourg Court has considered the right to be forgotten (we wrote about the Court’s judgment in the Article 8 case of ML & WW v Germany, 28 June 2018, in an earlier post). [read post]