Search for: "Tompkins v. 23andMe, Inc."
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2014, 11:49 am
” Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Hagood, ND California 2014http://t.co/jQWB2kq2ue -> Browse wrap agreement not enforced Tompkins v. 23andMe, INC., ND California 2014http://t.co/l9f8h0cudR -> Host liable for contributory infringement for not taking down infringing photo Rosen v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
(Cites to Tompkins v. 23andMe and Lee v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:47 am
Barnes & Noble * 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe * Court Blesses Instagram’s Right to Unilaterally Amend Its User Agreement–Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm
Barnes & Noble 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe Facebook’s “Browsewrap” Enforced Against Kids–EKD v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 7:31 am
Dropbox, Inc., 2022 WL 2673080 (N.D. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
Barnes & Noble 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe Facebook’s “Browsewrap” Enforced Against Kids–EKD v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:54 am
As Eric noted in his post about 23andMe’s browsewrap gaffe, “cross-referencing the TOS during checkout would have been a trivially easy step that would have been 100% legally effective. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
Sellers v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:03 am
Google” “Jawbone Plaintiff Can Invoke California Choice of Law Provision in Service Agreement” “23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe” “Vendor Fails to Form Either an Online or Paper Contract With Customers–Kwan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am
Mar. 30, 2017) Tompkins v. 23andMe, Inc. 840 F.3d 1016 (9th.Cir.2016) Ingalls v Spotify USA, Inc 2016 WL 6679561 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm
Nov.10, 2014) Tompkins v. 23andMe, INC., (N.D.Cal. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:54 pm
Contrast the reasoning and result in this case with Tompkins v. 23andMe and Nguyen v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
” Tompkins v. 23andMe, Inc., No. 14-16405 (9th Cir. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:12 am
Dillon v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Barnes & Noble * 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe * Court Blesses Instagra [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Hagood, ND California 2014http://t.co/jQWB2kq2ue -> Browse wrap agreement not enforced Tompkins v. 23andMe, INC., ND California 2014http://t.co/l9f8h0cudR -> Host liable for contributory infringement for not taking down infringing photo Rosen v. [read post]
