Search for: "Tompkins v. Tompkins" Results 221 - 240 of 351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Tompkins in their course in civil procedure, and they may also read an excerpt from the Supreme Court's prior decision in Swift v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
So holds the New York intermediate appellate court in today’s Brown v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:54 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Contrast the reasoning and result in this case with Tompkins v. 23andMe and Nguyen v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
Sabbagh v Pantano, 170 AD2d 411, 412 [1991]; Ginsburg v Equitable Life Assur. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:27 am by Beth Graham
The FAA was enacted in the 1920’s before the landmark federalism case of Erie v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:47 am
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 74 (1938), when federal courts preside over cases brought under their “diversity jurisdiction,” which lets them hear suits involving people from different U.S. states, they applystate law in making relevant decisions. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) Tompkins – Not that it matters, but Judge grants motion to dismiss amended false marking complaint with prejudice for failure to comply with In re BP Lubricants: Tompkins v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, termination of employment under Civil Service Law §71 does not necessarily involve a termination of benefits awarded pursuit to General Municipal Law §207-c, as such benefits 'are a property interest that may not be terminated without procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment' (Matter of Gamma v Bloom, 274 AD2d 14, 16; see Matter of Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes, Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO v City of Cohoes, 94 NY2d 686, 691; Matter of Meehan… [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
Tompkins abolished the old federal common law and forced federal courts to apply state law in cases heard under diversity jurisdiction. [read post]