Search for: "Towns v. Packard" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2009, 9:38 pm
The reality is those numbers are (were) greatly skewed by Micron Technology and Hewlett-Packard both having facilities in town. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
Hewlett-Packard Co.Court: Delaware Supreme Court Docket: 208, 2011 November 21, 2011 Judge: Jacobs Areas of Law: Business Law, Corporate Compliance, Labor & Employment Law, Legal Ethics Plaintiff brought this action under 8 Del. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
: (Techdirt), User generated font community: (Techdirt), Copyright has stretched so far that it has broken – discussion of R Fleischer’s article in ‘Future of copyright’ series: (Techdirt), Antigua doesn’t see settlement with US over WTO plan to let it ignore US copyrights: (Techdirt)   Events 16 June: USPTO town hall meeting on industrial designs - Alexandria: (Daily Dose of IP), 16 June / 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am by Florian Mueller
Against "Wintel", Apple tried to enforce copyright all the way up to the Supreme Court but failed "except for the ruling that the trash can icon and folder icons from Hewlett-Packard's NewWave windows application were infringing". [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]