Search for: "Townsend v. Little" Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 This will have a direct impact of the decision on Ed Sheeran "Let's Get it On" v "Thinking Out Loud" case [Katpost here], where Sheeran's lawyers argued that the Let's Get It On deposit defines the scope of protection, but Townsend's team argued that the composition is embodied on the Gaye recording. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:10 am by Eric Goldman
by guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard, Professor of Law (Tulane Law School); Lepage Faculty Fellow (A.B. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
This is very similar to the approach adopted by the High Court of this Jurisdiction in NT1 v Google and in Ireland in Townsend v Google under the pre-GDPR data protection legislation. [read post]
However, the CUI Registry is rather generic and provides little guidance with respect to specific documents. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
Challenge to Will based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence rejectedIN RE ESTATE OF TORNABENDOCKET NO. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am by Jack Sharman
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:07 pm by Steve Vladeck
But that role is more than a little modest. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 7:14 am by John Floyd
  Court Proceedings Perfunctory   On August 12, 2015, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]