Search for: "Trademark Cases"
Results 21 - 40
of 23,849
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 1:52 pm
Pursuing a trade secret misappropriation claim generally waives the right to claim a trade secret privilege because an ultimate issue in the case is whether the information qualifies as a trade secret. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 10:52 am
The guidance recognizes that practitioners use AI to prepare and prosecute patent and trademark applications. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:27 am
Substitute Analysts in Marijuana Cases. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm
Proc. 97-35, and cases like RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:32 pm
The United State Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released guidelines for AI patentability in February 2024. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:47 am
" The burden then shifted to Stafford to rebut Carousel's prima facie case. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 10:09 pm
The court examined how abandonment is a defense in trademark infringement cases, requiring discontinuation of a mark’s use with no intent to resume. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 2:00 pm
Apr. 1, 2023) Over a dissent, the panel reverses the grant of summary judgment on noninfringement, reasoning that the overlap in the use of the (descriptive) word RAW between the parties’ somewhat related products was enough to avoid summary judgment—which should rarely be granted in trademark cases (ugh), despite major visual differences and the lack of actual confusion evidence and low confusion rates shown by the parties’ surveys. plaintiff's… [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 2:31 pm
., case number 4:21-cv-01091), for counterfeiting and trademark infringement due to the unlicensed use of Penn State’s marks on apparel sold by Vintage. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”): The USPTO published a guidance declaring that while AI systems and other “non-natural persons” cannot be listed as inventors in patent applications, the use of an AI system by a natural person does not preclude a natural person from qualifying as an inventor. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Such is the case with the ice cream brand Dreyer’s, which people in the eastern half of the U.S. know as Edy’s. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
The first Florida case that allowed a third-party to be enjoined for helping violate a restrictive covenant was called W. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 6:14 am
The main issue regards the Board of Appeal (BOA) decision in ‘NIGHTWATCH’ case (R 1241/2020-4 of 26/09/2022 – see here our previous comment). [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm
Specifically, the model demonstrates how hard cases may have distorted not just discrete rules but entire fields, like trademark genericide and Fourth Amendment law. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 8:38 am
It must be a text-based mark, an image-based mark, or, in some exceptional cases, a 3D mark. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:02 am
Allen & Goel Marketing Company Court Case Number: 1:24-cv-00134-HAB-SLCFile Date: March 29, 2024Plaintiff: Optical Tactics, LLC d/b/a Fort Wayne Printing CompanyPlaintiff Counsel: Defendant: Allen & Goes Marketing CompanyCause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal False Designation of Origin, Federal Passing Off, Federal Unfair Competition, Trademark Dilution, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Injunctive ReliefCourt:… [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The court awarded Forest River a $2 million judgment in its trademark infringement case against local competitor inTech Trailers Inc., a ruling that could have significant implications for the industry. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 10:29 pm
In a recent trademark infringement case in federal court in California, a court evaluated whether a company’s officer could face liability for trademark infringement and cybersquatting. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:07 pm
” While franchisors and franchisees rely on one another for success, it is no secret that franchisor-franchisee relationships often end in disputes—in many cases with the parties going to mandatory arbitration. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:45 pm
This week in Other Barks & Bites: a Delaware district court throws out a $500 million patent infringement case against Sony; the U.S. [read post]
