Search for: "Trademark Cases" Results 121 - 140 of 19,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2021, 3:38 am
Because the proposed mark immediately conveys knowledge about Applicant’s goods, it is merely descriptive under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1).And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here. [read post]
In earlier cases, most notably the Combit case (C-223/15), the Court expressly recognized the possibility to limit the territorial scope of prohibition of use (and so the unitary character) in case of “linguistic grounds”. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:46 pm
Jeffrey Coller, Knoxville Criminal Defense Attorney is prepared to take on your case and make sure your rights were not violated. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 6:30 am by Kenan Farrell
Sullivan Court Case Number: 1:21-cv-00143-JRS-DMLFile Date: January 18, 2021Plaintiff: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.Plaintiff Counsel: Kevin W. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:57 am by Dennis Crouch
These were primarily entertainment related copyright and trademark cases, although he has worked on a few patent cases as well. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:46 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Nicole Morris is the Director of the TI:GER Program and Professor in Practice for Emory Law School in Atlanta, Georgia. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Most intellectual property matters are case managed and many cases likely continued with varying degrees of delay under case management directions. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 11:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
While there are a couple of cases allowing terms that had distinctiveness, then became generic, to reclaim that earlier distinctiveness, I’m not aware of cases allowing a once-functional product feature to become nonfunctional.] [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 10:35 am by Rubric Legal LLC
The Specifics of the Original Case The underlying case, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:25 am
” (Emphasis by the Board).Trademark Rule 2.41(a)(1) states that a prior registration "may be accepted as prima facie evidence of distinctiveness in appropriate cases. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:30 am by USPTO
And we saw the passage of the Trademark Modernization Act, the most important trademarks legislation in decades. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 8:08 am by Kevin M. Finson
Case date: 13 January 2021 Case number: No. 20-1709 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:58 am by Riana Harvey
He also noted the Court’s discussion of punitive damages - or rather non-discussion - and how payment of compensation was to be considered with regards to whether it would constitute an abuse of rights.Using the example of the Swedish Trademark Act (Chapter 8, Article 4) as well as Article 13, David noted that the law in practice does not just look at the strict definition of damage. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm by Herbert Hovenkamp
Yet too often the government has proven antitrust violations against large firms only to have the case fall apart at the remedy stage. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:00 pm by Juvan Bonni
The Arthrex Case Explained (Source: Bloomberg Law) Prof. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 6:38 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  It is not uncommon for the attorneys’ fee awards in such cases to dwarf the matter at issue. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 6:01 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Given the fact that the name of Alaimo’s new company bears a striking resemblance to the name of his employer, one might expect NYSA to have included trademark infringement in their list of allegations, but that requires the case to fit very specific parameters in order for the plaintiff to be successful. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
When The Courier-Journal of Louisville, Ky. published a recipe for a boozy "Derby pie," did it violate the federally registered trademark for Derby Pie? [read post]