Search for: "Traffix Devices, Inc v. Marketing Displays, Inc" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 2:30 am by John L. Welch
Marketing Displays Inc., 532 U.S. 23, 58 USPQ2d 1001 (2001), to narrow trade dress protection by providing a broader definition of functionality.Professor Cohen finds that "[d]espite its seeming clarity, many scholars have struggled to make sense of the TrafFix decision, and many courts have struggled to apply it." [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:57 pm
The premiere exhibit page shows a dual-spring road sign from TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003) and TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 5:10 pm
The premiere exhibit page shows a dual-spring road sign from TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:45 am by Marc Whipple
It is an old principle, recently re-affirmed in TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  But that’s exactly the argument that the Supreme Court rejected in TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am by Marc Whipple
It is an old principle, recently re-affirmed in TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]