Search for: "Train v. NRDC, Inc" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2008, 10:47 pm
The Natural Resources Defense Council has filed its brief in the US Supreme Court case about the Navy's use of mid-frequency active (MFA) sonar in training exercises off the California coast, Winter v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 12:42 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., No. 07-1239, the case about the Navy's use of mid-frequency active (MFA) sonar in training exercises off the California coast:In the case below, the district court and the Ninth Circuit both determined that the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:26 am by David Strifling
EPA, 711 F.3d 844 (8th Cir. 2013). [2] NRDC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Finding that the statutory language was “subject to at least two different interpretations,” that court went on to apply the familiar rule of administrative law from the case of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
Environmental organizations argue that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decisionĀ in Whitman v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
” That is because, in the latter instance, “[j]udges are trained to do that, and it can be done in a neutral and impartial way in most cases. [read post]