Search for: "Transit Commission v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2012, 5:19 pm by Arina Shulga
The defendants had solicited and pooled public funds with the stated intention of investing approximately 97% of the proceeds in United States Treasury bills, and using the remainder to hedge the account by trading futures contracts on Treasury bills. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
It requires that the secretary submit a yearly report to Congress detailing: DHS’s responsibilities for “coordinating the election infrastructure critical infrastructure subsector”; One-year and five-year plans for improving the security of election infrastructure that include “lessons learned, best practices, and obstacles from the previous year”; Election infrastructure work with each individual “State, unit of local government, and tribal and… [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:50 am by William Ford
Julia Solomon-Strauss and Stephen Szrom discussed the latest developments in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 3:51 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court Chief Justice, William Rehnquist in the 1987 decision, United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:55 am by New Hampshire Employment Law Letter
While the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has declared that the term “sex” in Title VII includes transgender protection, that interpretation hasn’t been vetted extensively by the courts and may not be resolved until United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 12:40 pm
Additionally, modern economic tests, including the HHI24 and SSNIP25 may not be useful to an agency in its initial stages of organization or an economy transitioning towards market principles and, as the AML states, "promoting the healthy development of socialist market economy. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:09 am by Michael J. Riccobono
Citing the United States Supreme Court’s landmark holding in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:05 am by Florian Mueller
., import ban by the United States International Trade Commission) against Apple. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:44 am by The Charge
Marbury, was so enraged at being denied his commission that he sued for it directly in the United States Supreme Court under a legislative provision so permitting.  [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:17 am by ser52
: Critical Reflections on the Status of Irregular Migrants in Europe and the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Air traffic controllers in the United States work for the Federal Aviation Administration (the “Agency”) and, while protected under Title VII, are also subject to special procedural rules reserved for federal employees. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Ultimately, the Commission certified the EIR and approved the project. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:26 pm
NSSTA's backward step: Re-focus on "protecting, preserving and promoting" structured settlement laws already enacted in the United States Internal Revenue Code and 47 state structured settlement protection statutes; Consolidate and transition NSSTA's administrative, financial and political strengths. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Andrew Hamm
” By contrast, she observed that her favorite decisions were United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Transit Admin., No. 06-1029, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 463 F.3d 50; 2006 U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:16 pm by Bridget Crawford
The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
ASCAP, 1940-43 Trade Cas. ¶56,104 (SDNY 1941); United States v. [read post]