Search for: "Transportation Line v. Cooper"
Results 41 - 60
of 227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2019, 2:14 am
It serves both as the outward expression of the core of the Basic Line of the Chinese Communist Party as the leadership collective of the nation, as well as the current manifestation of that Basic Line as the principles of the “New Era” theory developed by the current leadership core of the Chinese State and its Communist Party collective, which along with the elements of the United Front, represents the collective of the Chinese nation. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
In re American Cruise Lines, Inc., 128 USPQ2d 1157 (TTAB 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:19 am
Cooper, which asks whether the Constitution gives Congress power to revoke the states’ immunity from suit for copyright infringement, and race-discrimination case Comcast v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Société de Transport de Montréal, 2017 QCCA 1919 (38012) Can police be civilly sued here. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
This clarifies an aspect of South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
Secretary of Transportation must construct “such airports. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 10:30 am
Or.); U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 10:30 am
Or.); U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:53 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:27 pm
While Chief Justice Roberts' NFIB v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 pm
We don't think the Oklahoma Supreme Court has gone further than allowing regulatory violations as evidence of negligence, see Jack Cooper Transport Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
Kelly v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the 2022 case that overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
" (Hat tip: NASA Watch)COMSTAC minutes: The Oct 11th meeting, in which Deputy Secretary of Transportation Thomas J. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 5:44 am
Taxi Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:24 pm
The bottom line is that a BFPP must be able to prove it provided full cooperation, assistance, and access to U.S. [read post]
