Search for: "Transportation Line v. Cooper" Results 101 - 120 of 224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm by Michael S. Levine
  In doing so, the New Jersey Supreme Court limited application of its decision in Cooper v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm by Jared Beck
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:44 am by Bill Marler
During the preparation, transportation and storage of prepared foods, the organism can multiply to reach a threshold needed to cause infection. [4] The danger posed by the risk of Listeria in ready-to-eat meats has prompted the USDA to declare the bacterium an adulterant in these kinds of meat products and, as a result, to adopt a zero-tolerance policy for the presence of this deadly pathogen. [7, 29] A USDA Baseline Data Collection Program done in 1994 documented Listeria contamination on… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 7:43 pm by Bill Marler
During the preparation, transportation and storage of prepared foods, the organism can multiply to reach a threshold needed to cause infection. [4] The danger posed by the risk of Listeria in ready-to-eat meats has prompted the USDA to declare the bacterium an adulterant in these kinds of meat products and, as a result, to adopt a zero-tolerance policy for the presence of this deadly pathogen. [7, 29] A USDA Baseline Data Collection Program done in 1994 documented Listeria contamination on… [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 Jonathan Markell’s 18 months behind bars is perhaps the most given in a transnational antiquities trafficking case since U.S. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Murr implicates the Court’s regulatory takings jurisprudence, and asks whether Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
  The Court of Appeals begins its analysis of the case by outlining the background of the prosecution that resulted in these convictions:The United States Department of Transportation provides funds to state transportation agencies to finance transportation projects. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
  Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
Additionally, these same powers will cooperate with Iran “in the field of peaceful uses of nuclear energy” and “mutually determined civil nuclear cooperation projects. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Unfortunately, the decision does not distinguish land lines from cell phones. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:08 pm by Bill Marler
During the preparation, transportation and storage of prepared foods, the organism can multiply to reach a threshold needed to cause infection. [4] The danger posed by the risk of Listeria in ready-to-eat meats has prompted the USDA to declare the bacterium an adulterant in these kinds of meat products and, as a result, to adopt a zero-tolerance policy for the presence of this deadly pathogen. [7, 29] A USDA Baseline Data Collection Program done in 1994 documented Listeria contamination on… [read post]