Search for: "Trust Co. of Texas v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2010, 11:13 pm by Andrew & Danielle Mayoras
Can the Anna Nicole Smith Estate be lucky enough to revive her case in the United States Supreme Court twice? [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am by Don Cruse
Workers compensation death benefits STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am by Wolfgang Demino
Cronenwett's Declaration, he asserts that he is familiar with the legal services necessary to handle similar claims and that he is familiar with the reasonable charges for such services in the United State District Court for the Northern District of Texas and within the state of Texas. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 11:47 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division issued an opinion on August 16, 2011, in a case dealing with lender-placed insurance. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
Notes Brandon Beck co-authored the merits brief for Respondent in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm by Michael Lowe
Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 770 F.2d 399, 407 (4th Cir. 1985) and United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:18 am by MOTP
This case construes, as a matter of first impression in Texas state court, the standards for a “reasoned award” in arbitrations brought under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 6:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Under Justice Jackson’s canonical concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm by Joe Mullin
  “They are the patent examiners....They are paid by the United States of America. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
We're the government, and we're here to copy - Blueport Co. v. [read post]