Search for: "Tucker v. Texas" Results 41 - 60 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
On the second day of the Supreme Court’s new term, the justices heard arguments in Rutledge v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 6:08 am by Rachel Sachs
Bormes, in which it held that the federal government’s sovereign immunity is not waived by the Little Tucker Act with respect to damages actions under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 3:11 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 12299 (WD WI, Feb. 7, 2011), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed for lack of specificity an inmates broad claim that he was deprived of his religious preference.In Tucker v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Tucker Higgins at CNBC. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:55 am by Dennis Crouch
Here, the catalog in question was taken to the Tucker Rocky dealer-only trade show in Fort Worth Texas in July 2009 (before the critical date). [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm by Steve Hall
It involves cases prosecuted today, with Brady violations in the cases of Michael Anderson and Jamal Tucker. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
Texas, 15-797, a state-on-bottom capital case with roots in Houston. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:32 pm
- New York attorney Jeff Neuburger of Proskauer Rose in the firm's New Media & Technology Law Blog The Arkansas Supremes Hold that FDA Label Approval Provides Safe Habor from Consumer Fraud Claims - New York lawyer Russell Jackson of Skadden on his blog, Consumer Class Actions and Mass Torts CBO Projects Minimal Impact of Tort Reform - Pennsylvania attorney Michael Cassidy of Tucker Arensberg in the firm's Med Law Blog Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling Allowing EEOC to Issue… [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
Tucker, Secretary, 11-7185, a state-not-on-top habeas case out of the Fourth Circuit.  [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:00 am by Michael Gibbs
  Yet the opening pages of Oleg V. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:05 am
Clinton Elkhorn Mining Company Issue: Whether a coal company that did not meet the Tucker Act statute of limitations may seek a tax refund (with interest) directly under the Export Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]