Search for: "Tucker v. Texas" Results 61 - 80 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2011, 3:11 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 12299 (WD WI, Feb. 7, 2011), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed for lack of specificity an inmates broad claim that he was deprived of his religious preference.In Tucker v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm by Steve Hall
It involves cases prosecuted today, with Brady violations in the cases of Michael Anderson and Jamal Tucker. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
Texas, 15-797, a state-on-bottom capital case with roots in Houston. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:32 pm
- New York attorney Jeff Neuburger of Proskauer Rose in the firm's New Media & Technology Law Blog The Arkansas Supremes Hold that FDA Label Approval Provides Safe Habor from Consumer Fraud Claims - New York lawyer Russell Jackson of Skadden on his blog, Consumer Class Actions and Mass Torts CBO Projects Minimal Impact of Tort Reform - Pennsylvania attorney Michael Cassidy of Tucker Arensberg in the firm's Med Law Blog Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling Allowing EEOC to Issue… [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:00 am by Michael Gibbs
  Yet the opening pages of Oleg V. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
Tucker, Secretary, 11-7185, a state-not-on-top habeas case out of the Fourth Circuit.  [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:05 am
Clinton Elkhorn Mining Company Issue: Whether a coal company that did not meet the Tucker Act statute of limitations may seek a tax refund (with interest) directly under the Export Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:00 am by Steve Vladeck
” Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) is a professor of law at the University of Texas School of Law. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The Court will not hear an appeal of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision which reversed the lower court’s ruling that the State of Texas had violated the Endangered Species Act in its administration of the state water permitting program which allegedly denied adequate amounts of fresh water at the Aransas, Texas Whooping Crane preserve. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:57 am
District Court, Northern District of Florida (Tallahassee); Tucker v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
Provide Commerce * Texas Ethics Opinion Approves Competitive Keyword Ads By Lawyers * Court Beats Down Another Competitive Keyword Advertising Lawsuit–Beast Sports v. [read post]