Search for: "Tucker v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Specifically, the pro-preemption decision Tucker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Whether the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. 1491(a)(1), or Indian Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. 1505, grants the Court of Federal Claims subject-matter jurisdiction over an Indian Tribe’s claim for money damages against the United States, based on the United States’ purported violation of sources of law that do not themselves mandate a damages remedy for their violation. 2. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:44 am
The CAFC, relying of the 1894 Schillinger decision, held that Zoltek could not assert a Fifth Amendment takings claim, since a particular claim for patent infringement by a government contractor sounded in tort and hence could not be brought against the United States under the Tucker Act. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 7:19 am
United States was stated as follows: The statute of limitations in the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 4:04 pm
That seems obvious enough, but the point arose in an interesting context in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The core issue is one we've dealt with extensively before, and which the Supreme Court addressed in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]