Search for: "Tucker v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm by Cody Poplin
The air strikes mark the third time that the United States has attacked the al Qaeda affiliate since beginning of bombing last year. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The core issue is one we've dealt with extensively before, and which the Supreme Court addressed in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:52 pm by Ben Rubin
Department of Agriculture (2013) 133 S.Ct. 2053, holding that California raisin handlers could maintain a takings claim as an affirmative defense to an enforcement action filed by the United States, and that the Hornes were not required to first file their claim in the Federal Court of Claims. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Corr v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm by Mandelman
THE COMPANY’S ADDRESS – The address on MIFR’s contract shows the company is located at “4426-B Hugh Howell Road, Suite 200 Tucker, GA 30084. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Post has settled a libel claim brought by two individuals who were pictured on the front page with headline the headline “Bag Men: Feds seek duo pictured at Boston Marathon. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm by Jay B. Gould
Weston Capital Asset Management, LLC, et al., Civil Action Number 14-CV-80823-COHN, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
 He then took up the first issue in the case, noting that the Court of Federal Claims is acourt of limited jurisdiction that, pursuant to the Tucker Act, may hear `any claim against the United States founded upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract with the United States, or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort. [read post]