Search for: "Tucker v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am by Yvette Mabbun and Kelly Vazhappilly
United States, 290 U.S. 13 (1933) (allowing a property owner to directly bring a Fifth Amendment claim for compensation upon the taking of the property, without pursuing, for example, the state-litigation requirement as contemplated in Williamson County)[13]; First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:29 am by Michael R. McDonald and Genna A. Conti
The two prior decisions in this matter, addressing the issue of who should decide whether an agreement permits class arbitration, align well with the United States Supreme Court’s January 9, 2019 holding in Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
Pfizer Inc., Superior Court, Santa Clara County, California, No. 1-04-CV026653 Pfizer to pay $490.9 million to settle charges of illegal marketing of Rapamune Ropes & Gray United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 6:46 am by Aurora Barnes
The petitions of the week are: Tucker v. [read post]
It is Congress, not the president, that has the power to “provide for the ... general welfare,” “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states,” to appropriate money, and “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution” all “powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States. [read post]
29 May 2007, 3:40 pm
United States, is whether the Tucker Act's six-year statute of limitations is a jurisdictional bar to an inverse condemnation claim. [read post]