Search for: "Tucker v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2016, 1:39 pm
, Olivier Moréteau, Louisiana State University (United States)V.B Diverse in Unity? [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm
Tucker v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:44 am
Garske, (United States)· Good Faith, United in Diversity? [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am
” The United States has also pledged $139 million in humanitarian aid for Yemen. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:49 am
United States Marshals Service, November 3, 2015, Lynch, G.). [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority 13-1559Issue: (1) Whether, as the United States implicitly conceded below, the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) exercises sufficient federal power to mandate separation-of-powers scrutiny for purposes of a suit seeking injunctive relief and invoking the Little Tucker Act to seek monetary relief; and (2) whether the Metropolitan Washington Airports Act of 1986, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am
It seems to me that is not the most desirable state of affairs. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:06 pm
Ruiz, 710 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2013), United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
Secretary of State John Kerry announced that the United States and Russia will collaborate in bringing forward a United Nations Security Council resolution to identify the perpetrators of chemical attacks in Syria. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:37 am
Secretary of State John Kerry announced that the United States and Russia will collaborate in bringing forward a United Nations Security Council resolution to identify the perpetrators of chemical attacks in Syria. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
Judge Tucker based that ruling on Himmelberger v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:13 pm
And the worst part is that the only umpires for this impending conflict will be: you guessed it -- unelected lawyers in black robes.What may come as news to some is that the United States has been there before -- and the results were not pretty.Start with a church's tax-exempt status: it can be removed for teaching and holding principles that are contrary to federal law, as happened in the 1983 case of Bob Jones University v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:18 pm
The issuance or sale of securities is subject to regulation by the United States Securities Exchange Commission and by authorities in every state, including the Securities Division of the Office of the Indiana Secretary of State. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:29 pm
The United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:58 pm
” The Court won’t be settling that issue in the case of Horne v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:02 am
<> The Hopi Tribe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
Because the Hopi Tribe has not identified a money-mandating obligation that the United States allegedly violated, we must affirm the Court of Federal Claims' dismissal of this suit for lack of jurisdiction under the Indian Tucker Act. [read post]
