Search for: "Tudor v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2012, 4:32 am by Siobhan Hayes
The case is Avocet Industrial Estates LLP v Merol Ltd and Tudor Rose International Ltd and it raises a number of points which will be of interest to investors and those managing investment property.Payments by cheque There was an implied agreement that payment could be made by cheque because some payments had been made by cheque (although recent payments were made by BACS). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 6:26 am by Just Security
Analyzing State Employment Authorization for Noncitizens in the US by Ahilan Arulanantham (@ahilan_toolong) FISA Surveillance Reform The Year of Section 702 Reform, Part V: The HPSCI Majority FISA Working Group Report by Elizabeth Goitein (@LizaGoitein) and Noah Chauvin (@NoahChauvin) Biden Administration: Spy Tools The Biden Administration Should Continue Rebuffing NSO Group’s Latest Lobbying Efforts by Talya Nevins, Nicole Mo and Carrie DeCell (@cmd_dc) Supreme Court Ethics… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 3:15 am
Mr and Mrs Patel ran a newsagent on Tudor Street opposite the main entrance of the Inner Temple and thus familiar to most members of the bar. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:56 am by The Legal Blog
 This Court also took note of the principle stated in White & Tudor’s Leading Case in Equity volume 18th edition at p.444 – wherein it is stated, “Election is the obligation imposed upon a party by Courts of equity to choose between two inconsistent or alternative rights or claims in cases where there is clear intention of the person from whom he derives one that he should not enjoy both… That he who accepts a benefit under a deed or will… [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am by Giles Peaker
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:48 am by David Y. Trevor
Two recent decisions illustrate the fact that the old rules still apply: In Tudor v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:48 am by David Y. Trevor
Two recent decisions illustrate the fact that the old rules still apply: In Tudor v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Despite “the difficulty & awkwardness of operating by force on the collective will of a State,” armed federal intervention in state affairs must be permitted.[4]During the Convention, on three different occasions, Madison tried to grant the federal government this absolute “negative” (what we now call a veto) over all state legislation. [read post]
20 May 2018, 8:02 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Although the particular abuses against which the prohibitions were directed had been cured by the time of the Tudors, the rules continued to survive. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]