Search for: "Tun-Jen Chiang"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2012, 9:46 am
[This was also on Professor Tun-Jen Chiang's list—see my summary there.]Mark F. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 8:25 am
As the first addition to this project, Tun-Jen Chiang (George Mason) has suggested four additions to Madison's list of patent classics, which are listed below along with my own brief summaries. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 10:01 am
" But Tun-Jen Chiang has argued that the levels-of-abstraction problem is pervasive in patent claiming, and few would argue that we should thus abolish patent claims. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 11:58 am
The Trespass Fallacy in Patent Law, by Adam Mossoff (see Tun-Jen Chiang's response, Mossoff's reply, and Chiang's sur-reply)Copyright, Free Speech, and the Public's Right to Know: How Journalists Think About Fair Use, by Patricia Aufderheide, Peter A. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 11:58 am
The Trespass Fallacy in Patent Law, by Adam Mossoff (see Tun-Jen Chiang's response, Mossoff's reply, and Chiang's sur-reply)Copyright, Free Speech, and the Public's Right to Know: How Journalists Think About Fair Use, by Patricia Aufderheide, Peter A. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:19 am
Rev. 1 (2012); Tun-Jen Chiang, A Novelty-of-Idea Theory of Patent Scope, Wash. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:56 am
., Peter Lee, Patent Law and the Two Cultures, 120 Yale L.J. 2 (2010); Tun-Jen Chiang, The Rules Versus Standards of Patentable Subject Matter, 2011 Wisc. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:13 am
A recent post discussed Professor Tun-Jen Chiang’s (George Mason University Law School) forthcoming article arguing that the inequitable conduct doctrine’s incentives to disclose are “upside down,” resulting in excessive deterrence for minor errors and inadequate deterrence for the most severe fraud. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:16 am
In The Upside Down Inequitable Conduct Defense (forthcoming Northwestern University Law Review), Professor Tun-Jen Chiang argues that the inequitable conduct defense is improperly tailored because it creates too much deterrence for minor errors while providing inadequate deterrence for serious patent fraud. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
Tun-Jen Chiang: In tech field, we have more appreciation of the fact that everything’s cumulative, but patent law on the ground (as opposed to doctrine) is not necessarily responsive to that. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:54 am
Guest Post by Tun-Jen Chiang, Assistant Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law One of the longstanding myths about the Federal Circuit is that it is formalist. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:55 am
Tun-Jen Chiang - One thing that does not seem to have arisen in this discussion is the impact on trademark law. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
(Patently-O) Guest post on best mode by Tun-Jen Chiang (Patently-O) (Patently-O) America Invents Act: Other provisions in effect now (Inventive Step) US Patents USPTO updates fee schedule, but does not yet offer micro entity discount (Patent Docs) Chief Judge Rader: Improving patent litigation (Patently-O) Dissents: Judges Newman and Dyk (Patently-O) USPTO Issues Final Notice for Track I Fee-Based Prioritized Examination (Patent Law Practice Center) New inter partes… [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:36 pm
By Jason RantanenProfessor Tun-Jen Chiang's post on best mode (below) argues that Congress must necessarily have intended that patent applicants would not disclose best mode, given that it was aware of the potential consequences of removing litigation enforcement. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
--A reply to Professor Sheppard Guest Post by Tun-Jen Chiang, Assistant Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law Imagine a parent who gives his child a box of matches, and tells the child not to play with the matches. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:16 am
While Tun-Jen Chiang's (George Mason) post on PrawfsBlawg details what was said (and what was not said and how to interpret all of this), of more interest to me is subjecting CJ Robert's premise to data. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:13 am
Briefly: Tun-Jen Chiang of PrawfsBlawg argues that Chief Justice Roberts’s criticism of legal academia is an “implicit attack” on the qualifications of his colleagues – Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan – who are former law professors. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 3:25 am
Whether or not that was true, there was no purpose in disputing the point.At PrawfsBlawg, Tun-Jen Chiang asks why we want judges to be great lawyers. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 6:43 pm
Now, following up on Howard Wasserman's post about how the centrality of the Declaration of Independence, and mindful of Tun-Jen Chiang's careful-what-you-wish-for advice about novel constitutional arguments, I must say that I would like to see the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 11:30 am
In The Levels of Abstraction Problem in Patent Law (forthcoming in the Northwestern University Law Review), Tun-Jen Chiang (George Mason Law) argues that courts do not even acknowledge that this problem exists; rather, they select a level of abstraction "arbitrarily and silently. [read post]
