Search for: "Turner v. Fair" Results 61 - 80 of 322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm by Eric Goldman
The brief emphasizes the applicability of strict scrutiny because: “Florida is restricting the services’ protected speech—their editorial judgments about whether and how to display user content” PruneYard and FAIR don’t apply here, and Turner dictates strict scrutiny (I have no idea what Turner really stands for). [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 2:35 pm
In People v Brown (2009 NY Slip Op 03334 4th Dept 4/24/09) the Court held that a single failure, specifically the "defense counsel's failure to object to the admission in evidence of the victim's medical records, which contained information concerning prior allegations of sexual abuse against defendant" constituted ineffective assistance of counsel requiring reversal of a conviction for sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child.The Court… [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:22 am
Representing her, James Turner QC argued that: "It offends against the principles of fairness to treat the wealth in the present case as if it had all been acquired by the joint efforts during the relationship" and that: "There are very powerful reasons, indeed overwhelming reasons, to justify and require a departure from the equality principle. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 8:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Moody struck down the Florida social media rules was that they, "unlike the state actions in FAIR and PruneYard, explicitly forbid social media platforms from appending their own statements to posts by some users. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
Turner appealed, but a two-judge majority held that there was no jurisdiction over the appeal because of United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:03 am by John Steele
This past Term, the Supreme Court disappointed the civil-Gideon movement in Turner v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 pm by John Floyd
  U.S. v Turner   In a June 22, 2017 decision, United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 9:40 am by Eugene Volokh
FAIR, 390 F.3d 219, 240 (3d Cir. 2004) (discussing such compelled inclusion), rev'd, 547 U.S. 47 (2006). [214] Reply Brief for Appellants, FAIR v. [read post]