Search for: "Turner v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 1,314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2022, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Although the Supreme Court did not address the defendants’ contention that the amended complaint should be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action, we reach that issue as an alternative ground for affirmance (see Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 544-546; Kauffman v Turner Constr. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:19 am by Karwan Eskerie
The Tribunal noted that on the facts, the disclosure would have annoyed certain states and therefore come within the narrower construction of the exception. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:32 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 One of those announced this week was the South Carolina case involving a father's contempt proceeding for failure to pay his child support.The case, Turner v Rogers, involved a series of contempt proceedings conducted in the family court. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:39 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 One of those announced this week was the South Carolina case involving a father's contempt proceeding for failure to pay his child support.The case, Turner v Rogers, involved a series of contempt proceedings conducted in the family court. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:53 am by Walter Olson
Ross, Short Circuit on Turner v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
In Turner v Rogers, the Court began from a premise it regarded as both legally significant and unquestionably true: that child support proceedings are civil. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 4:24 am by Susan Brenner
Turner determined there were no mechanical deficiencies that would have contributed to the collision.People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am by INFORRM
Despite repeated requests to abandon what the Defendants stated was a hopeless claim, Ms Pryor fought on, issued, and pursued a privacy claim, represented by Bond Turner solicitors in Liverpool and Robert Sterling (counsel). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm by Administrator
Even though the agreement specifically stated that PBA was not a fiduciary, the Court, citing Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm by Administrator
Even though the agreement specifically stated that PBA was not a fiduciary, the Court, citing Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm by Administrator
Even though the agreement specifically stated that PBA was not a fiduciary, the Court, citing Briscoe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
’” To support the majority decision, Justice Kennedy cites three main cases that established precedent regarding jailing and invasive searches: Turner v. [read post]