Search for: "Turner v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
Katfriends Morag MacDonald (Bird & Bird, left), Richard Vary (Nokia), Sally Field (Bristows) and the eponymous Mehmet Gün are there too, not to mention EPLAW Honorary President Pierre Véron, Margot Fröhlinger (all the way from Eponia), knowledgeable Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons), the dashing Justin Turner QC and, well, you can see for yourself who else is there ... [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Bank v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:18 am
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court addressed in Turner v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
Judgment was handed down today by Mr Justice Bean in the libel case of Cooke and Anor v MGN ([2014] EWHC 2831 (QB)). [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:49 am
The court in Turner v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 9:59 am
However, following the Supreme Court of Florida’s decision in Turner v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:33 pm
Ginsburg United States V. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 8:34 am
The style of the case is, Acadia Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:30 am
To help them cross that line, let’s enjoy some river music, as Tina Turner belts out a little Proud Mary. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
Katzburg comported with the protections the United States Supreme Court mandated in Turner v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
The Harris Court cited, with approval, a 2002 traumatic cancer case, State ex rel. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:55 am
North Carolina (No. 13-633) Turner v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
United States, 13-632, Turner v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:10 am
In the case of Turner v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
James was relisted this week along with eleven of its closest friends: Turner v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
Turner v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:05 am
In State of Washington v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:05 am
In State of Washington v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
” (para 77)“I accept that what Mr Turner was describing was obvious,…” (para 85)To state what in itself should now be obvious, Virgin won, and Rovi’s patent was held invalid for lack of inventive step over the first piece of prior art. [read post]
