Search for: "Turner v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 1,154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The Claimants Michael Turner and Nikki Sanderson have sought permission to appeal the damages they were awarded. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
Katz, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles 6 $257,679,500 Consumer Protection State of Louisiana v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Thomas gave us the answer in his opening paragraph in his brutal dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
 Other notable Offer of Amends cases include Winslet v Associated Newspapers [2009] EWHC 2735 where he found that the court did have power to order a statement in open court under the offer of amends regime in Kate Winslet’s case and Turner v NGN [2005] EWHC 892 where the newspaper had falsely claimed that Mr Turner pressurised his wife into having sex with other men and a discount of 40% was applied under the offer of amends regime. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
Meanwhile, NPR and SCOTUSblog have previews for this morning’s arguments in Turner v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 11:49 am by Daniel Schwartz
Already, some employers have started to say that they are going to cover the costs for employees in certain states to fly to other states to receive an abortion. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:50 am by Léon Dijkman
According to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), anti-suit injunctions are incompatible with the Brussels I Regulation [see C-159/02 Turner v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center, Lisa Soronen looks at Ohio v. [read post]