Search for: "Turner v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 1,311
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2021, 6:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
id=1497436 12:45 – 1:00: Opening (Lillian Alvernaz, Indian Law Section Chair; James Taylor, Criminal Law Section Chair; Sam Alpert, State Bar of Montana)  1:00 – 2:45: The Death Penalty in State & Federal Courts Panelists: Michael Donahoe, Deputy Federal Defender, Federal Defenders of MontanaSK Rossi, Owner, Central House Strategies Gary Mitchell, AttorneySession Moderator: James Taylor, Managing Attorney, Tribal Prosecutors… [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:40 am by Daily Record Staff
The trial court sentenced Turner to a term of incarceration of life plus 80 ... [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 8:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
 4:45 – 5:00:  Closing Day 2: (presented with the Criminal Law Section, State of Montana) Friday, May 7, 2021 12:45 – 1:00: Opening (Lillian Alvernaz, Indian Law Section Chair; James Taylor, Criminal Law Section Chair; Sam Alpert, State Bar of Montana)  1:00 – 2:45: The Death Penalty in State & Federal Courts Panelists: Michael Donahoe, Deputy Federal Defender, Federal Defenders of MontanaSK Rossi,… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm by Phil Dixon
Error to deny evidentiary hearing on IAC claim for failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence of brain damage; district court properly denied alleged Brady and Batson violations U.S. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am by Eric Goldman
ACLU indicated, Red Lion, Turner, and Sable “provide no basis for qualifying the level of First Amendment scrutiny that should be applied to the Internet. [read post]