Search for: "Turner v. State Bar" Results 1 - 20 of 250
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2023, 5:37 am by Nicholas Nugent
Since most online content constitutes speech, does the First Amendment completely bar the state from regulating in this space? [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
[They include] the diffusion of information and the arraignment of all abuses at the bar of public reasons. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm by Hyemin Han
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in NetChoice v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Several Election Deniers Backed by Trump Prevail in Hotly Contested Primaries MSN – Hannah Knowles (Washington Post) | Published: 8/3/2022 Several election deniers backed by former President Trump prevailed in closely watched primaries on August 2, as a nationwide battle over the future of the GOP played out in state and federal races across five states. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Yang Liu and Brandon Vines discussed the impact of Louisiana v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 11:49 am by Daniel Schwartz
For now, I appreciate the statement from the American Bar Association President Reggie Turner; as I mentioned earlier, I will be joining the Board of the ABA this August. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The “doctrine of judicial estoppel may bar a party from pursuing claims which were not listed in a previous bankruptcy proceeding” (Moran Enters., Inc. v Hurst, 160 AD3d 638, 640 [2d Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 908 [2018], rearg denied 32 NY3d 1195 [2019]; see Popadyn v Clark Constr. [read post]
The rate of pay required for non-exempt employees is the regular rate during the pay period the leave is taken if the employer uses the workweek method, or alternatively the employer can use a 90-day lookback for determining the average regular rate, that is generally the same as with the normal state paid sick leave law (unless the employer has any flat-sum bonuses involved, in which case the employer will need to use the Alvarado-method of calculating the regular rate, as detailed here). [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Mark MacCarthy
It accepts that the different policy goal, articulated in the Supreme Court’s Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]