Search for: "Turner v. State Bar" Results 221 - 240 of 256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[20] Although the parties are not obligated to reach their ultimate contractual objective, the parties are barred from renouncing the deal, abandoning negotiations, or insisting on conditions that do not conform to the preliminary agreement.[21] This category is commonly referred to as a Type II agreement.[22] Third, the letter of intent can be completely nonbinding. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Last week, we reported on the Bar Standards Board’s disbarring of barrister David Harris, who tweeted as @geeklawyer. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm by Gordon Ahl
West and Nicol Turner Lee for a panel discussion. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:46 am by Sally-Ann Underhill and Mira Midelieva
Boskalis referred to a hypothetical scenario where the period inserted in Box 24 is shorter than 21 days, arguing that there would be no commercial basis for barring Charterers’ defence for failure to respond within such a short period. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:34 am
You check your watch, hoping that he will get on with it before last orders at the bar. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
[They include] the diffusion of information and the arraignment of all abuses at the bar of public reasons. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am by Dan Markel
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Rena Steinzor
Turner and associate Alexandra Hamilton, the piece announces unnecessarily that agencies issue a great deal of guidance, as demonstrated by the case Appalachian Power Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
Supreme Court will almost certainly extend the scope of the Second Amendment right to bear arms to limit state and federal regulation of firearms, based on oral arguments in McDonald v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm by Jan von Hein
Consistently with its reasoning in Gasser (Case C-116/02) and Turner v Grovit (Case C-259/02), the Court held in West Tankers that “even though proceedings [to enforce an arbitration agreement via an anti-suit injunction] do not come within the scope of [the Brussels I Regulation], they may nevertheless have consequences which undermine its effectiveness”, if they “prevent a court of another Member State from exercising the jurisdiction conferred on it by… [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
The trial court's original order entering the jury verdict is available on Westlaw as Liebeck v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
 A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said :   (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]