Search for: "Turner v. State Bar" Results 241 - 260 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
It is important for us to speak directly to not just the securities bar, but also to everyone that is interested in our work. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
The trial court's original order entering the jury verdict is available on Westlaw as Liebeck v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
 A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said :   (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Barristers were, and still are, a law unto themselves and 1973 was a time when it was said that you could fit the whole of the Patent Bar into the back of a taxi. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:56 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/3z9svqa (Philip Gordon) No Duty to Disclose That Office Equipment Retained Data — Putnam Bank v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
" There were no barriers in US TM law, because of decisions like 1968's Chanel v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
Anderson, Rashawn Ray, Nicol Turner Lee and Jon Valent, and will be moderated by Elaine Kamarck. [read post]
The rate of pay required for non-exempt employees is the regular rate during the pay period the leave is taken if the employer uses the workweek method, or alternatively the employer can use a 90-day lookback for determining the average regular rate, that is generally the same as with the normal state paid sick leave law (unless the employer has any flat-sum bonuses involved, in which case the employer will need to use the Alvarado-method of calculating the regular rate, as detailed here). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:09 am by admin
    You squeeze through a narrow income band   In market housing, the test is simpler – get your income over the bar. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:38 am by Wells Bennett
The evidence, according to Lewis, will show that so far, Guantanamo force-feeding practices thoroughly violate legal standards set by the Turner v. [read post]