Search for: "Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm
Around 2010, some studios started enforcing, e.g., Twentieth Century Fox sued over copying of plot of Phone Booth and was successful. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 7:48 am
—upheld the trial court’s granting of summary adjudication in favor of Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Fox 21, Inc. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:26 am
As a result, condition (v) was deemed satisfied.Turning to likelihood of confusion (condition (vi)), the court recalled that this requires a global appreciation, taking into account all relevant factors, and must be undertaken from the perspective of the average consumer (see Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41).Benefit submitted that no such likelihood of confusion would subsist because of case law… [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 8:39 am
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003) to find that plaintiff’s Lanham Act claim failed. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
This frustrating pattern of campaign finance reform leading to unintended consequences and bitter disappointment continued in the twentieth century. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am
On Thursday 2 November, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v Comic Enterprises Ltd. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:35 am
Pictures 2009) INSIDE JOB (Representational Pictures 2010) (documentary) THE INSIDER (Blue Lion Entertainment 1999) MARGIN CALL (Before The Door Pictures 2011) QUIZ SHOW (Baltimore Pictures 1994) ROGUE TRADER (Granada Film Productions1999) THE SOCIAL NETWORK (Columbia Pictures 2010) TOO BIG TO FAIL (HBO Films 2011) (dramatized documentary) WALL STREET (Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation 1987) WALL STREET: MONEY NEVER SLEEPS (Edward… [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 1:11 am
A variety of principles are applied when considering a likelihood of confusion, set out in more detail in the decision of Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (discussed more here).An alternate claim under section 10(3) of the TMA sets out that a trademark is infringed when it a person "…uses in the course of trade, in relation to goods or services, a sign which is identical with or similar to the trade mark, where… [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 5:33 am
The worldwide members of ACE are Amazon, AMC Networks, BBC Worldwide, Bell Canada and Bell Media, Canal+ Group, CBS Corporation, Constantin Film, Foxtel, Grupo Globo, HBO, Hulu, Lionsgate, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), Millennium Media, NBCUniversal, Netflix, Paramount Pictures, SF Studios, Sky, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Star India, Studio Babelsberg, STX Entertainment, Telemundo, Televisa, Twentieth Century Fox, Univision Communications Inc.,… [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:26 am
Indeed, Judge Birss in ALK-Abello Limited v Meridian Medical Technologies [2010] EWPCC 14, described access to justice for small and medium sized enterprises as a ‘decisive factor’.However, in Comic Enterprises Limited v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2012] EWPCC 133, Judge Birss held that "the decisive factor" was Comic Enterprises’ approach to the litigation, despite its being an SME (Katpost here). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
Darren MealeFrom former guest Kat Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons and IPEC DDJ) comes a very handy review of the past twelve months in trade mark litigation. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 22 A.D.2d 452, 456, 256 N.Y.S.2d 301, aff’d, 15 N.Y.2d 940, 207 N.E.2d 508 (1965), cited recently by Justice Tom, concurring in Nussenzweig v. diCorcia, 38 A.D.3d 339, 346, 832 N.Y.S.2d 510, certified question answered, order aff’d, 9 N.Y.3d 184, 878 N.E.2d 589 (2007). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Kitchin LJ stated [at 66]: “An application for the registration of a series of trade marks is an application to register a bundle of trade marks under a single reference number. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 9:26 am
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, that origin, in Section 43(a), “refers to the producer of the tangible goods that are offered for sale, and not to the author of any idea, concept, or communication embodied in those goods. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Last week the Federal Court granted an interlocutory injunction restraining ITVBOX.NET, WATCHNSAVE INC, MTLFREETV.COM and others from selling set-top boxes preloaded with software. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:11 am
* Series trade marks are a bundle of separate trade marks, Court of Appeal declares in Fox's latest Glee challengeThe Court of Appeal has wrapped up the final outstanding point (the validity of a series mark registration) in the long running dispute between Twentieth Century Fox Corporation (Fox) and Comic Enterprises Limited (CEL). [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
The Court of Appeal consisting of Lady Justice Arden, Lord Justice Lloyd Jones and Lord Justice Kitchin (who gave the leading judgment) handed down its decision on this point last Wednesday in Comic Enterprises v Twentieth Century Fox Film [2016] EWCA Civ 455 . [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:23 am
But the expression "trade mark bullying" has entered common parlance, at least among trade mark practitioners, and I suppose that as a lexicographer - a label which I can't really fail to acknowledge - I am committed to accepting the way language is used, although under no obligation not to be critical about it.Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 455 (25 May 2016) is as unedifying a case of a… [read post]
13 May 2016, 12:19 pm
Earlier this year, the screenwriter for the television show Empire was sued for copyright infringement, along with other defendants, including production company Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 1:30 am
The recent decision of Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation dealt with a series of comedy clubs in the UK called The Glee Club, existing in Cardiff and Birmingham, among other cities. [read post]
