Search for: "Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2006, 4:00 pm
Thanks to Peter Zura's Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog for uncovering "Patently Non-Obvious: Empirical Demonstration that the Hindsight Bias Renders Patent Decisions Irrational," where Gregory N. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:21 am by nipper
Kappos and the Anti-State-Street-Majority Modern Times Legal Patent Blog – Near-knockout: 10 takeaways from the Supreme Court’s Bilski decision Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog – SCOTUS Bilski Decision: “Do No Harm” Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates – Supreme Court Decides Bilski; Rules that Business Methods Survive – Supremes Decide Bilski: Machine or… [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 8:45 pm
Peter Zura's Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog reports on a recent district court decision applying the 271(e)(1) "safe harbor" to research tools. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 5:35 am
"See in this regard the comment to that GAO Report at:Peter Zura's Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog, which points to recommendations for USPTO reform as made in a 298 page report by NAPA, the National Academy of Public Administration, referred to at IPCentral, and summarized at I/P Updates and also here by Florence Olsen .Related ArticlesAlexander George, Law firms beef up patent lawyer ranksWilliam R. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (PRA)Via the University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog we are directed to Richard Epstein's column at the Financial Times ( website which views the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (PRA) as A dangerous one-two punch, arguing that changes to rules on patent-based injunctions and patent infringement damages would dampen patent innovation.As far as injunctions are concerned, Epstein points to… [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:39 am
Patent Office claims a roughly seventy percent grant rate. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
 Just watch out when one of us starts blogging about dead people. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 4:03 pm
Finally, the MARQUES Class 46 blog welcomes back fellow Kat Birgit Clark with these two posts here and here, one of which touches on the perennially fascinating topic of gummy bears versus gold-wrapped chocolate bears ... [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Seventy two comments so far give the idea of how much the IPKat’s readers are getting passionate to this story.* The chorus swells - another entreaty to the AC about BattistelliMerpel recounts of another letter upon the hot issue of the suspension of a Board of Appeal, this time from Dr Tilman Müller-Stoy. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 11:16 am
In such cases, the contribution must be accounted for in evaluating the comparability of the controlled transaction to uncontrolled comparables, and accordingly in determining the arm's length consideration in the controlled transaction.More transfer pricing guidance from the IRS here.In other taxing IP news, "Peter Zura's Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog" has pointed out that, a few weeks ago, the Select Revenue Measures Subcommittee of… [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:28 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Readers paying attention to the news around the globe will find it easy to think of manyfold examples confirming this simple truth, but as this blog is a patent blog, let us turn back our attention to a popular subject on this blog, the independence of the EPO’s Boards of Appeal, or the lack thereof as some critics claim. [read post]
27 Aug 2006, 8:18 pm
Journal Blog brings word that the Patent & Trademark Office has instructed its examiners not to rely on Wikipedia in assessing the validity of patents. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
When compared to the prior art, the asserted claims of the '375 patent differ in only one way: the use of a powered conveyor controlled by a switch. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 1:02 pm
Because the present issue of claim preclusion is one particular to patent law, this court applies its own law without reference to regional circuit law. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
In some sense, then, the Court’s unanimity is less surprising than the fact that the federal law it struck down had remained on the books for seventy-one years. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:44 pm by Colin E. Flora
On December 16, 2015, Plaintiff submitted his first demand to Defendants in the amount of Seventy-Two Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($72,500.00).7. [read post]